Trump’s War On Transgender Service Members

This week LGBTQ Americans received a one-two punch from the Trump administration.


Published:

The first punch was President Trump’s ban against transgender service members. In his inimitable style of communicating to the American public the order came in the form of a tweet:

 

“After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military,” Trump tweeted. “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you”

 

Ironically, Trump's tweet comes on the 69th anniversary of President Harry Truman’s executive order desegregating the U. S. military in 1948, and from a Vietnam draft dodger who received five deferments, one of which was a medical diagnosis for bone spurs in his heels.

 

The second punch occurred on the same day of Trump’s ban. The Justice Department filed court papers citing Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bars discrimination in the workplace based on “race, color, religion, sex or national origin,” but it does NOT bar discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. For LGBTQ service members, the fight for LGBTQ employment nondiscrimination protections was never more urgent than now. An execution of Trump’s ban would immediately put approximately over 15,500 active-duty transgender service members at risk of losing their jobs not to mention the shock and outrage it would bring to their fellow service members.

 

Since the military policy “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) in 2011 allowed LGBTQs to openly serve unfortunately military medical polices continue to discriminate against our trans population. While evidence have shown that the military spends 5 times more on erectile dysfunction medications such as Viagra and Cialis than it does providing medical services for transgender troops the bias persists nonetheless.  And, Trump’s binary views of gender along with the perceived exaggerated cost of gender-reassignment surgery give rise to his notion that transgender healthcare is a” tremendous medical costs and disruption” to the military. 

 

While Trump’s ban caught the Pentagon and Capitol Hill off guard the announcement was enthusiastically applauded by numerous anti-LGBTQ hate groups across the country who have long advocated for it, promulgating the fear that healthcare services to our transgender troops would gravely hurt defense spending. 

 

In a recent ad by the Family Research Council, for example, Chelsea Manning is pictured next to a military jet with the question "Which one do you want our military to be spending your tax dollars on - transgender surgeries or equipment?”   

 

And, the Catholic League, being in lockstep with Pope Francis who compares transgender people to nuclear weapons and destroying and desecrate God’s holy and ordained order of creation tweeted “Kudos to Trump for banning men and women who switch genitals from the military. The armed forces are not a lab for sexual engineers.”

 

Today, it is surprising to me that amid several wars that need every able person who wants to serve our transgender patriots would be excluded. Back in the day, LGBTQ service members who served our country were either closeted about their sexual orientation or gender identity or were discharged under “honorable conditions” called “Fraudulent Enlistment.”

 

Military readiness is not a heterosexual cisgender calling.

 

Trump’s ban reverts to the military’s history of intolerance eerily reminiscent of the same argument used when the military did not want to racially integrate its ranks.

 

Transphobia, like racism and sexism, in our armed forces is militarily dangerous because it thwarts the necessary emotional bonding needed amongst service members in battle, and it underutilizes the needed human resources to make a strong and democratic military.

 

Our transgender service members are prepared to defend this country with their lives. An absence of them would show how America will not be able to present itself as a united front on the battlefield because the real war in America is with itself.

 

Follow Curve on Facebook and Twitter

 

Edit ModuleEdit Module
Edit ModuleShow Tags

Related Articles

My Black Lesbian Body Is A Target For Police Brutality

The reality of unarmed African American women.

Donna Brazile’s Revenge With “Hacks”

Donna Brazile has written a book unveiling how Trump got into the White House.

John Kelly Needs A Queer History Lesson On The Civil War

White Americans, like Kelly, must learn the full and accurate history of the Civil War.

The Posthumous Outing Of Whitney Houston

2017 is a year of open but not new revelations about Whitney Houston.

Add your comment:
Edit ModuleShow Tags


Rev. Irene

Rev'd Up

About This Blog

 

The Reverend Monroe is an ordained minister, motivational speaker and she speaks for a sector of society that is frequently invisible.
 
Monroe is  a Huffington Post blogger and a syndicated religion columnist. Her columns appear in 43 cities across the country and in the U.K, and Canada.  And she writes a weekly column in the Boston home LGBTQ newspaper Baywindows

Monroe stated that her "columns are an interdisciplinary approach drawing on critical race theory, African American , queer and religious studies. As an religion columnist I try to  inform the public of the role religion plays in discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer people. Because homophobia is both a hatred of the “other ” and it’s usually acted upon ‘in the name of religion,” by reporting religion in the news I aim to highlight how religious intolerance and fundamentalism not only shatters the goal of American democracy, but also aids in perpetuating other forms of oppression such as racism, sexism, classism and anti-Semitism."

 

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

Feed

Atom Feed Subscribe to the Rev. Irene Feed »